What is the net worth of Emma Watson? The British actress, activist and model Emma Watson has a net worth of $85 million. Watson is from the United Kingdom. Her portrayal of Hermione Granger in the eight successful film adaptations of J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter books catapulted her to the forefront of the entertainment industry at an early age.
Since then, she has acted in a variety of roles in a number of successful films. Emma’s endorsement deals with businesses such as Calvin Klein, Lancome, Dolce & Gabbana, and Burberry have netted her tens of millions of dollars in addition to the salary she receives for her acting work. Please read more about the net worth of Emma Watson below.
Table of contents
Net Worth of Emma Watson: Biography
Her full name is Emma Charlotte Duerre Watson and she was born on April 15, 1990 in Paris to English parents Chris Watson and Jacqueline Luesby, both attorneys. Her full name is Emma Charlotte Duerre Watson. Up to the age of five, Watson called Maisons-Laffitte, which is located close to Paris, home. When she was just a child, her parents got a divorce, and Watson moved to England to live with her mother in Oxfordshire. On the weekends, she would visit her father at his home in London.
Watson has stated that she is able to communicate in French, albeit “not as well” as she once did. She enrolled in the Dragon School in Oxford shortly after moving to Oxford with her mother and brother, and she remained there until the year 2003. She had the ambition to be an actress since she was six years old, and she began her training at the Oxford location of Stagecoach Theatre Arts, which is a part-time theater school. There, she received training in singing, dancing, and acting.
At the age of ten, Watson had already participated in Stagecoach performances and school plays such as the “Arthur: The Young Years and The Happy Prince”, but previous to the Harry Potter series, she had never acted professionally. Following his time at the Dragon School, Watson continued his education at the Headington School in Oxford.
Up to five hours of daily instruction were provided to her and the other members of her cast while they were on the set of the picture. She participated in the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) tests in June 2006 and received grades of eight A* and two A. She earned her Associate of Science degrees in English, Geography, Art, and the History of Art in May of 2007. The next year, she decided to focus on the three A levels instead of History of Art, and she achieved an A in all three subjects she took.
After finishing secondary school, Watson took a gap year to film Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Parts 1 and 2, beginning in February 2009. She stated that she planned to continue her education and later confirmed that she would be attending Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. After spending 18 months at the university, Watson made the announcement in March 2011 that she would be postponing the start of her degree program for “a semester or two.”
Despite this, Watson participated in the Visiting Student Program at Worcester College, Oxford during the 2011–2012 academic year. In an interview that aired in 2014 on The Ellen DeGeneres Show, Watson explained that it took her five years rather than four to complete her degree because, as a result of her acting career, she “wound up taking two full semesters off.” Watson made this statement soon before she graduated. She received her B.A. degree in English literature from Brown University on May 25. Her graduation date was May 25.
Net Worth of Emma Watson: Career
The subject of the net worth of Emma Watson starts with her amazing career. Casting for the movie adaptation of the best-selling novel Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, which was written by the British author J. K. Rowling, began in the year 1999. Casting agencies discovered Watson through her Oxford theater teacher, and producers were impressed by Watson’s self-assurance in her performance. Watson, along with fellow applicants Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint, was informed by producer David Heyman that they had been cast in the parts of the school pals Hermione Granger, Harry Potter, and Ron Weasley, respectively, following eight separate auditions. Watson had Rowling’s support from the very beginning of the screening process.
Watson made her first appearance on the big screen for the 2001 film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. The movie was the highest-grossing release of 2001 and set new marks for the number of tickets sold on opening day and over the opening weekend.
The performance of Watson was singled out by reviewers as particularly worthy of praise; The Daily Telegraph referred to her work as “admirable,” and IGN claimed that she “stole the show.” Watson’s work in The Philosopher’s Stone earned her five nominations for various accolades, and she ultimately took up the Young Artist Award for Leading Young Actress.
A year later, in the second installment of the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Watson once again played the role of Hermione Granger. The performances of the two main actors were appreciated by critics. The Los Angeles Times stated that Watson and her co-stars had grown up between films. However, The Times criticized director Chris Columbus for “under-employing” Watson’s very popular character in the picture. As a result of her performance, Watson was honored with an Otto Award by the German publication Bravo.
The seventh Harry Potter book, called Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, was published that year (2004). Hermione’s more forceful role was recognized and praised by Watson, who referred to it as “a terrific character to portray” and praised her “charismatic” personality. T
he performance of Watson was praised by critics. A. O. Scott of The newspaper New York Times made the following observation: “To our good fortune, Ms. Watson’s sharp impatience serves as a counterpoint to Mr. Radcliffe’s monotony. Hermione’s definitely nonmagical punch to Draco Malfoy’s merited nose wins the loudest applause, despite the fact that Harry may demonstrate his growing wizardly skills. Hermione also earns the loudest applause.”
Despite the fact that Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban had the lowest box office receipts of the entire Harry Potter film series, Emma Watson’s performance in the film earned her three awards: two Otto Awards and the Child Performance of the Year award from Total Film.
Both Watson and the entire Harry Potter film series accomplished significant new feats with the release of the movie Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire in 2005. The film’s opening weekend sales in the United Kingdom and for the Harry Potter franchise both broke records.
With “touchingly earnest” performances in The New York Times and Peter Bradshaw in The Guardian, Watson demonstrates that “within and beyond the world of magic there is a growing disparity” between “a teenager’s status and her increasing emotional and intellectual growth.” Critics wrote praise for the increasing maturity of Watson and her teenage co-stars.
According to Watson, a significant portion of the comedy in the movie came from the conflict that developed among the three main characters as they grew older. She was quoted as saying, “I enjoyed all of the arguing…. I think it’s lot more realistic that they would argue and that there would be problems.” In recognition of his work on “The Goblet of Fire,” Watson was presented with a bronze Otto Award.
In 2006, Watson played Hermione in a special mini-episode of Harry Potter called “The Queen’s Handbag.” This episode was a celebration of Queen Elizabeth II’s 80th birthday and featured a brief appearance by Hermione. 2007 saw the release of the fifth and final installment in the Harry Potter film series, named Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.
The picture broke the record for the highest opening-weekend gross in the history of the globe box office with $332.7 million. The first-ever National Movie Award for Best Female Performance was given to Watson, and she won. On July 9, 2007, Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe, and Rupert Grint, who played their respective roles in the Harry Potter film series, left imprints of their hands, feet, and wands in front of the Grauman’s Chinese Theatre in Hollywood.
The popularity of both the actress Watson and the series continued to increase. During that same month, it was reported that Watson’s work on the Harry Potter series had earned her more than ten million pounds, and she recognized that she would never have to work for money again.
During the premiere of the movie Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 in July 2011, Watson was present alongside her co-stars Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint.
Before the publication of the book Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, the continuation of the Harry Potter series was uncertain because none of the three actors who play the lead parts had committed to playing those roles in the remaining films in the series.
During the renegotiation process, Watson displayed a level of ambivalence that was far lower than that of her co-stars. She explained that the decision was significant because the films represented a further four-year commitment to the role, but eventually she conceded that she “could never let [the role of] Hermione go,” signing for the role on March 23, 2007. She said that she “could never let [the role of] Hermione go.”
Ballet Shoes, a BBC film released in 2007, was Watson’s debut part outside of the Harry Potter franchise. The film was an adaptation of Noel Streatfeild’s novel of the same name. Sandra Goldbacher, who directed the movie, said that Emma Watson was “ideal” for the leading character of Pauline Fossil, an aspiring actress, because “she has a penetrating, delicate aura that makes you want to gaze and gaze at her.”
Boxing Day in the UK saw 5.7 million people tune in to watch Ballet Shoes, which received mixed reviews from critics. The following year, she provided her voice for the role of Princess Pea in the animation film The Tale of Despereaux, which was a children’s comedy starring Matthew Broderick. Her co-star from Harry Potter, Robbie Coltrane, also starred in the film. December of 2008 saw the debut of The Tale of Despereaux, which went on to earn $87 million around the world.
Late in 2007, principal photography began on the sixth Harry Potter film, and Watson’s scenes were shot between the 18th of December and the 17th of May of the following year. The first screening of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince took place on July 15, 2009, after it had been pushed back from its original November 2008 release date.
Critics were more ready to review the lead actors on the same level as the rest of the all-star cast of the franchise, which the Los Angeles Times hailed as “a thorough introduction to modern UK acting.” The principal performers were in their late teens at the time.
The Washington Post referred to Watson’s performance as “her most charming to date,” and the Daily Telegraph referred to the lead actors as “newly liberated and energized, eager to give all they have to what’s left of the series.” Both publications agreed that Watson had delivered “her most charming performance to date.”
Filming on the last installment of the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, began for Watson on February 18, 2009, and continued until June 12, 2010. The original novel was turned into two films that were made one after the other in order to accommodate both financial and scripting considerations.
The first installment of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was released in theaters in November 2010, and the second movie didn’t come out until July 2011. The second installment of the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, was a commercial and critical triumph. It ended up being Watson’s most commercially successful picture to this point, generating over $1.3 billion all over the world and becoming the highest-grossing film in the franchise overall.
Her filmography has expanded considerably since the release of the final Harry Potter film, with My Week with Marilyn in 2011, The Perks of Being a Wallflower in 2012, The Bling Ring in 2013, This Is the End in 2013, Noah in 2014, Colonia in 2015. (2017). She worked on Beauty and the Beast and received approximately $15 million, including performance bonuses, for her work on the film. Her starting wage for the film was three million dollars.
Life and Relationships
In an interview that took place in 2019, Watson claimed that she splits her time between New York City and London. She refuses to disclose her romantic relationships in public, citing the following as her reason: “If I mention my partner in an interview, then I can’t expect the paparazzi to leave me alone when I’m walking around outside my house and taking pictures of me with their cameras. You cannot have it both ways at the same time.”
Since the beginning of 2019, she has been romantically involved with the American entrepreneur Leo Robinton.
In 2014, when Watson was questioned about her religious beliefs, she responded by calling herself a spiritual universalist. Watson was given the position of visiting fellow at Lady Margaret Hall, which is part of Oxford University, in February of 2016.
She has stated that keeping rooted in her own personality helped her to “find serenity” in spite of the intense popularity that she had experienced from a young age. In 2013, she successfully completed the necessary training to become a certified yoga and meditation instructor. “to figure out how to be at home with myself,” she said, “I went to a week-long meditation course at a Canadian facility where residents are not permitted to speak.”
This was a requirement for this accreditation. In an interview with Elle Australia, she was asked about her meditation practice, and she responded by saying that preparing for an unpredictable future required finding “a method to ensure that I am constantly protected and at ease within myself. because I can never put my trust in a certain location.”
Thanks for reading our blog post about the net worth of Emma Watson. Have a good day!
All net worth information is collected and calculated from public information. When possible, we also incorporate private tips and comments submitted by the celebrities or their representatives. While we do our best to ensure that our figures are correct, they are only estimates unless otherwise stated. We welcome any refinements or criticism using the comment section below.